Looking for an Intercom Fin alternative?
Algomo is one AI agent on your website. It answers from your live pages, works those pages alongside the visitor, and books the ones worth a meeting. Fin is a support platform that answers on every channel and charges for each conversation it resolves.
How are you different from Intercom Fin?
Fin answers wherever your support arrives: email, phone, WhatsApp, your site. Algomo answers in one place, your website, and does more while it is there. It opens your pages beside the chat and its calls run inside the visitor's own session, so it sees their prices, their region, their login.
Four things Algomo does that Fin does not
Works the page
It opens the right page beside the chat and filters it with the visitor.
Watch it happenIn their session
Its calls run as the visitor, so the agent sees their prices, their region, their login.
From your coding agent
Built and changed from Claude Code or Codex over MCP, with no dashboard to learn.
How that worksOne amount
You set the monthly ceiling. Nothing is charged above it, and unused credit rolls over.
See the plansEvery Fin figure on this page was read from fin.ai and intercom.com on 31 August 2026. Every Algomo one links to the page on this site that sets it.
Why teams consider an Intercom Fin alternative
Fin is the best-run product in the category and this section is not about its quality. It is about the shape of the bill, which is where teams start looking, and it is the part with numbers you can check on Fin's own pages.
A meter with no ceiling
Fin charges 99 cents every time a conversation resolves. The better the product gets, the larger the invoice gets with it.
Qualification costs extra
A qualified conversation is $9.99 on top of the outcome charge. On Algomo it draws the same five credits as any other conversation.
Seats beside the usage
Seats run $29 to $132 a month next to the meter, so the bill has two engines rather than one.
A minimum before anything
On an external helpdesk Fin sets a 50-outcome monthly minimum: $49.50 before a single seat is counted.
Where an agent is described, in plain language: what it covers, how it speaks, what it may touch and where it hands off. What it will do is laid out on the screen, so nothing about its behaviour is a mystery.
Algomo vs Intercom Fin, side by side
Two products that overlap on your website and diverge everywhere else. Every row below is a yes or a no, and the ones that need a sentence carry it behind the question mark.
| Algomo | Intercom Fin | |
|---|---|---|
| Decision criteriaHow far each one lets you get before a sales conversation, and who operates it afterwards. | ||
| A free plan with no time limitAlgomo's free plan has no card and no expiry. Fin offers a 14-day trial, and Intercom gives startups a free first year, which are both programmes with an end date. | Yes | No |
| Pricing published on the vendor's own siteBoth publish, which is rarer here than it should be. Fin: $0.99 an outcome, $9.99 a qualification, seats $29 to $132. Algomo: free, then $50 to $4,300 a month. | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-on evaluation before any sales call | Yes | Yes |
| One monthly amount that caps every chargeAlgomo bills the amount you set and nothing above it. Fin's meter has no ceiling by design, because it charges for outcomes. | Yes | No |
| Built and changed from your own coding agent | Yes | No |
| Sits on the helpdesk you already runFin runs on Intercom's own inbox or the third-party helpdesks listed on the integrations page. Algomo does not sit on a helpdesk: your team takes over the conversation in place. | No | Yes |
| ChannelsWhere each agent can answer. This is the section where Fin wins outright, and if most of your support arrives anywhere but your website, it is the section that should decide it. | ||
| Website chat | Yes | Yes |
| No | Yes | |
| Voice | No | Yes |
| SMS and WhatsApp | No | Yes |
| Instagram and Messenger | No | Yes |
| In the visitor's sessionWhat each agent can do while the visitor is still on the page, as against what it does behind the conversation. | ||
| Opens the right page beside the chat | Yes | No |
| Calls run as the visitor, in their sessionAn Algomo action runs inside the visitor's own session, so it sees what they see. Fin acts on your systems from the conversation instead. | Yes | No |
| Acts on your systems behind the conversation | Yes | Yes |
| Connectors discovered from your own siteAlgomo finds the endpoints your own pages already call, so nothing is wired by hand for a public system. Private systems are set up with us. | Yes | No |
| Prebuilt connector library, wired per system | No | Yes |
| Live takeover by a human, transcript attached | Yes | Yes |
| What lands on the invoiceThe same month of traffic, charged two different ways. | ||
| A charge for each resolved conversation | No | Yes |
| A charge for each qualified conversation | No | Yes |
| Per-seat fees beside the usage | No | Yes |
| A monthly minimum before anything else | No | Yes |
| Unused allowance rolls overAlgomo credits roll over on a paid plan and never expire, holding up to 40% above the plan. Fin's outcome charges are per event, so there is nothing to carry. | Yes | No |
See the row Fin answers No to
Seventeen rows above answer Yes on one side and No on the other. Acting inside the visitor's own session is the one you can watch: on Nike's website, with no integration project with Nike, the agent opens the results page beside the chat, filters it, opens the shoe the visitor picks and reads the stock on it, without the visitor leaving the conversation.
That recording is on our Nike demo page. Nike is not an Algomo customer, and no brand shown on this site is.
Where these rows come from
Fetched 31 August 2026, from the vendor's own pages. The $0.99 per outcome, the $9.99 per qualification and the 50-outcome monthly minimum on external helpdesks are on fin.ai/pricing; the seat prices are on Intercom's pricing page. The channel list is on the channels page, the prebuilt connector library on the integrations page, and the free startup year is Intercom's own claim on its pricing page. Fin is also mid-acquisition: Salesforce signed in June 2026, and the full record is in our evidence post.
Ours are sourced the same way. The plans, the credit a conversation draws and the rollover are on this site's pricing page. Operating the agent from your own coding agent is documented on the MCP page. Everything the agent is shown doing is recorded on our Nike demo page.
Frequently asked questions
How is Algomo different from Intercom Fin?
Fin is a support platform with a helpdesk under it, answering on every channel and charging for each outcome. Algomo is one agent on your website that answers, acts on the page with the visitor, and books the ones worth a meeting.
Fin charges $9.99 per qualification. What does qualifying cost on Algomo?
Nothing on top. Qualifying happens inside the conversation, so it draws the same five credits as any other conversation.
Can Algomo run alongside our existing Intercom helpdesk?
Yes. Your team keeps its inbox; Algomo answers on the site, and your people can take over any conversation live, with the transcript attached. Nothing migrates, because the agent connects to the systems your site already uses.
Which channels does Algomo support?
Web chat on your website, and nothing else. Fin answers in email, voice, SMS, WhatsApp and Instagram as well. If most of your support arrives on those channels today, Fin is the better buy, and this page will still be here when the mix shifts.
How we compare with the rest of the field
Algomo vs Chatbase
The closest to Algomo in shape: a free plan, published prices, no sales call.
Read the comparisonThe whole field
Eighteen vendors in four tables, every price read from the page that prints it.
See the mapOther Intercom Fin alternatives, compared
vs Sierra
Their harness is Ghostwriter and a staffed agent-development org. Ours is the coding agent you already run.
vs Sierravs Decagon
They solve deployment with deployment engineers. We made deployment the part the agent does itself.
vs Decagonvs Ada
Enterprise service across voice, messaging and email, sales-gated, with a developer toolkit that lists MCP.
vs Adavs delight.ai
Sendbird's concierge, sold by demo, whose pricing URL redirects to an essay about pricing.
vs delight.ai[ next step ]