[ algomo vs sierra ]
Algomo vs Sierra
Both build agents that take real action. The difference: Sierra sends engineers, Algomo sends an agent that finds your APIs and connects itself.
[ 01 of 03 ] · comparison
Comparison
| Algomo | Sierra | How it connects to your systems | Before you sign anything | Where it runs | How you change what it does | Also available over MCP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovers the endpoints behind your own pages, then uses them. Private systems are wired in with our help. | Built per customer by their deployment engineers. | ||||||
| A working agent on your own site that you can use. | A sales process, then an implementation. | ||||||
| Your site (in the visitor's own session), plus the channels you switch on. | Server side. | ||||||
| Tell it, in plain language. It can write itself a new tool. | Through their tooling and their team. | ||||||
| Everything. | Not the configuration surface. |
[ 02 of 03 ] ·
No deployment project
Sierra's own hiring shows the model: engineers who build each customer's agent. That works, and you pay for it. Algomo automates that step.
You see it working first
You get the agent running on your site, then decide. No contract or scoping call required.
Algomo runs as the visitor
The agent acts in the visitor's session: their prices, availability and region, even on sites that block server-side traffic.
[ 03 of 03 ] · questions, answered
Questions, answered
Is Algomo just a cheaper Sierra?
It is a different mechanism. The agent does the integration work rather than a team doing it for you.
Can it handle things behind a login?
Yes, those we set up with you rather than discover.
What if our site changes?
It picks up the change and repairs what broke.
[ next step ]